This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate (Transcript)

The Plain Truth is so Happy That You Have Been Enjoying Bob’s Broadcasts.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE PLAIN TRUTH TODAY VIDEOBROADCAST: This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate

This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate

Okay, so this 250-page report has come out from the Election Oversight Group. The reason I want to talk to you about this today is because of what happened with Pam Bondi yesterday. And honestly, I need some new insight on this because I just don’t know where to go with this Pam Bondi thing. I thought it was not good yesterday. I just don’t think she’s capable of fixing the errors that have piled up. And we have to fix the DOJ. It must be fixed because there are too many important things riding on it.

One thing they are doing that is right is the Fulton County, Georgia situation with the 2020 election. The morning after the election, just to remind you, the Georgia Secretary of State went on national television and said 4.7 million votes had been cast. He said only about 2 percent remained to be counted, roughly 94,000 ballots. He said at that moment the margin was decisive, even suggesting that if one candidate won 100 percent of the outstanding votes, it wouldn’t change the outcome.

But when the final tally first came in, the total wasn’t 4.7 million votes cast. It was 5.023 million. Okay, wait—what? In Fulton County alone, the absentee ballots reportedly rose from 74,000 to more than 148,000 between election night and final certification. Where did that come from? That shift reversed the apparent outcome of the state. That’s why Donald Trump said, wait a minute, cheating is going on. The report now states that no known explanation has been provided to justify the surge.

Pause. If the numbers change by that magnitude after officials publicly declare near-final certainty, then we’ve got to get it right—not almost right. We need it right. We don’t need defensiveness or dismissal. We need clarity.

The report then goes into chain of custody. Investigators found that 148,000 absentee ballots were accepted and counted without first performing mandatory signature verification. Tens of thousands allegedly arrived at State Farm Arena in unsecured mail carts. Do you know what chain of custody is? It’s really important. It’s not a partisan phrase. It’s a basic legal principle.

Chain of custody comes into play in criminal trials and financial audits. When you gather evidence, you have to know who had that evidence. That’s one of the problems with the Epstein files. What’s the chain of custody? Whose hands were on that evidence? If the chain of custody breaks, you can’t rely on it anymore. You can’t count it as reliable because you don’t know how it got from one place to another.

The next issue they found was missing tabulator tapes. This is important because election law requires daily zero tapes. That proves the machine starts at zero. It also requires closing tapes to document the total at the day’s end. It proves the machine started at zero and shows the number of votes that came in.

According to testimony cited in the report, more than 100 required tabulator tapes—representing about 315,000 early votes—weren’t signed or weren’t signed properly. State investigators said they couldn’t locate the required zero tapes for early voting on many machines. The report concludes that the statute requires accounting and chain-of-custody records, but they don’t exist in the entirety of early voting. That’s a really big failure.

Then there’s the math problem. County records reportedly show 148,318 absentee ballots counted, yet there were only 125,785 voters. Let me give you a moment to do that math. You had 148,000 votes cast but only 125,000 people showed up to vote. That’s a gap of more than 22,000 ballots in a race decided by 11,779 votes. After multiple certifications, the counts didn’t match one another.

Here’s where this becomes serious, beyond politics. Philip Stark, a statistician from Berkeley—probably not a conservative—reviewed the process. He didn’t say it was widespread fraud, but he did say there are real reasons to distrust the election outcome. He found machine counts and audit tallies disagreed substantially, even about the number of ballots cast. He wrote that some ballots appeared to be included at least twice in the original counts and multiple times in recounts. He warned that unreliable ballot-marking devices could make recounts little more than “security theater.” Those are his words.

That’s devastating to trust in the Republic and our vote. Republics don’t crash when one side loses. They collapse when half the country believes the referee is unreliable. And that’s what’s happening. We don’t believe the referee.

This is why Pam Bondi’s position is so important. Historically, we’ve seen this before. After the Civil War, we almost lost the Union again. In Tammany Hall, New York operated on ballot manipulation. Reformers came in and forced structural transparency because everyone knew the system was corrupt.

Why do nations in Latin America or Eastern Europe spiral out of control? Not because their ballots were imperfect, but because citizens lost faith that ballots mattered at all. The flame of liberty needs oxygen. Confidence is the oxygen that keeps it alive. Without it, everything suffocates.

This is why Fulton County matters. It’s not about proving someone right or wrong. It’s not about relitigating personalities. They told Donald Trump, what difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election. No, it won’t—but we must know what happened so it doesn’t happen again.

This is about answering questions completely, transparently, and publicly. If the system is sound, prove it in daylight. If procedures failed, fix them openly. If records are missing, explain why and correct the structure—or arrest those responsible so it can’t happen again.

If Americans conclude outcomes can shift without documentation, if chain of custody is shrugged off as paperwork that doesn’t matter, if audits contradict themselves and we’re told not to dwell on it—of course we dwell on it. It’s an audit. Imagine the IRS auditing you and telling you your numbers don’t match. You can’t say, don’t dwell on that. Math is math.

If we can’t fix these things, elections stop being the peaceful transfer of power. Isn’t the left afraid of that? Isn’t the right afraid of that? One day someone won’t believe the election and will try to seize power. To stop that, you must have a full accounting of what happened in Fulton County.

If you don’t, suspicion becomes permanent. Once suspicion replaces consent, we’re no longer a self-governing republic. The founders didn’t design a system based on blind trust. They built checks and balances everywhere. The final check is the First Amendment—the right to protest, to question the government, to demand answers. The press is meant to question the government, not the people.

It all has to be verifiable: paper trails, public counts, checks and balances. I wanted you to hear this because the 250-page report came out, and I haven’t heard much about it. I don’t know if people understand how important this is.

If we don’t restore confidence one way or another, every future election will be fought not just at the ballot box but in the minds of citizens who no longer believe the box is secure or valid. That’s more dangerous than anything we’re facing right now.

If I hear one more person say, what difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election—here’s the difference. The question is whether Americans can trust how we decide. If we can’t answer that clearly and convincingly, with records we can show each other, then the damage doesn’t belong to Republicans or Democrats or independents. It belongs to the Republic itself.