Was a Coverup of a Scandal the real reason for Latest Trump Assassination Attempt? (Transcript)

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO BOB BARNEY’S 7:11 BROADCAST: Was a Coverup of a Scandal the real reason for Latest Trump Assassination Attempt?

Hello, this is Bob Barney with The Plain Truth today at 7:11, and I have a different take on the second assassination attempt of Donald Trump. My take is something that I think most people are surely not talking about. 

Unfortunately, my take is not going to be a very popular one for people if you decide what’s really going on here. Like most of us, I kind of thought that this assassination attempt was probably part of another deep state attack to try to kill Donald Trump however the more I started listening to it, this guy does not seem like he is a professional hitman at all.

Professional hitmen that work for the deep state or for other countries or even other governments, they tend to keep a low profile. They’re not constantly in the news and they’re not alarming their neighbors or going to Ukraine trying to find a fight and being sent home. In conclusion…. he had the earmarks of an idiot.

Useful idiots are used all the time so let me get into this. 

I had a show quite a few months ago about the CIA experiments with mind control back in the 1950s and we learned a lot in the Korean War when the Chinese took the American prisoners that the North Koreans had captured. They had indoctrinated them and got information out of them through Chinese torture and mind control tactics. In fact, the very famous movie, The Manchurian Candidate from 1964 was really a movie that outlined the assassination of a political president or vice president. I forget the entire theme right now, but the assassin was actually someone that was programmed in China during the Korean War. They were to be an assassin many years later when he returned to the United States like a war hero and it was a woman, I believe, in a dress or something like that, almost like Sirhan Sirhan, which we know, and I’ve talked about this to ad nauseam.

Sirhan Sirhan was also a patsy and he did not kill Robert Kennedy. 

Robert Kennedy’s own bodyguard behind him most likely shot him in the back of the head. This you can find on the Plain Truth on the Message Board right now where Bobby Kennedy Jr. is saying exactly what I just said, that Sirhan Sirhan did not shoot his father. He was a plant and every one of his shots hit other people or walls, not a person named Walls, but actual literal walls and a few other bystanders. His shots never hit Kennedy.

Kennedy was actually shot, according to Bobby Kennedy Jr., and I believe this, by his own security guy who was a former possible CIA agent. Surprise, surprise. But the CIA, with the use of a drug that was famous in the 1960s by Dr. Timothy Leary, which is called LSD, well, they used LSD in the 50s, the CIA that is. They used it to practice mind control on certain people. They found that people under the influence of LSD would be very amenable to be to be programmed by hypnotism, where a trigger would set them off. That’s what the movie The Manchurian Candidate was all about. And I do believe, like, when we see these school shootings, many times these school shootings are always by the same sort of person. It’s a loner, it’s a child, and they’re always on mind-altering medications…like retinol and things like that. These meds are forms of speed. These people are drugged up, they have a profile, and the deep state can look at these people, then they control these people, and they can set them off at any moment they need a story. For when they need a story to take something off the headlines that they don’t want to talk about. They’ll have a shooting somewhere, and they know all of the news media. I don’t care if it’s mainstream news, liberal news, or conservative news, all they’re going to cover for the next week is a mass school shooting whenever that happens.

So they can set off one of these people anytime they want through mind control.

I know this sounds bombastic, it sounds ridiculous, it sounds conspiracy theories, it sounds like I’m a mental idiot, but it’s the plain truth.

This is what the CIA practiced and learned as a skill in the 1950s and 60s. There are many books about it, there are many TV shows about it, there are many articles about it, there are many scholarly medical journals about the use of mind control to make people do things that they normally would not do, including assassinate people and become a shooter.  Then you go to, well, if this person, it’s not like necessarily what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania, where I do believe it was an assassination attempt, that I do believe the deep state and the Democratic Party was behind it. It’s my belief. I know I’m hitting every NSA computer is turning on right now, but I do believe that’s what it was. I don’t even believe that kid on top of the roof was the shooter that shot Trump. I think Trump was shot from another angle, and because Trump turned his head slightly is the only reason he’s not dead.

I don’t think that that 20-year-old whom his schoolmate said was a lousy shot in their gun courses made the shot that hit Trump, not even by luck. I think like Lee Harvey Oswald, he was planted there with a gun to make it look like he was the lone, stupid, lone assassin, moron, whatever you want to call him, mind-controlled idiot, but I think he was a patsy, and there was a serious attempt on Donald Trump’s life in Butler. I do not believe now, looking over the last several days and listening to the news stories and watching how the news is just focused on this shooter and on this attempt and how bad the Secret Service was, and by the way, I don’t think the Secret Service did that much wrong here, I’ll explain that in a minute, and then you have to say, is there a reason why possibly they would want to trigger an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, even if they knew it was not going to work?

Was there some news story that they did not want out?

Was there something going to break that Sunday, or possibly the next day, that they decided, we need to change the news for a while?

Remember Monday, I was talking about how the news can change and that God can change the news in an instant. Well, the deep state can change the news in an instant too!

They’re maybe not as good as God at doing it, but they can still do it when they want to cause a war, when they attack somebody, they have, you know have to bomb a milk factory, remember that under Bill Clinton. The deep state has a way of gaining the headlines that they want in an effort to get people off a story they don’t want. 

Several weeks ago, we played a segment of a former mafioso who has a radio show now named Michael Franzece, called Lying Nancy Pelosi is a Modern Day MOBSTER…by the way, if you want to find any stories we have posted, you can go to our Message Board and put Nancy Pelosi’s name in the search and you’ll find everything about Pelosi; you’ll also find this video of him. If you go to the broadcast here, theplaintruthtoday.com, and you look down over previous broadcasts, you will find a video, a YouTube video from this man who brought forth the story. He did get it from another news source, and he shows you the news source and all of the paperwork. Just to make this clear…this is not a conspiracy theory that Nancy Pelosi’s father, a former congressman and mayor of Baltimore, Maryland, (they’re not from California, btw), was under investigation by the Kennedy Administration. John Kennedy and his brother Bobby Kennedy, who was the attorney general, asked J. Edgar Hoover, formally, to investigate Pelosi’s father for mob ties. Turned out that he was controlled by the mob, and that he was taking bribes by the mob…. consequently, he was under the influence of the mob. The Kennedys, even though they were Democrats, and he was a Democrat, they were trying to root the mob out of politics all over the United States. This is one of the theories that most people believe got John Kennedy killed, and then later on Bobby Kennedy killed. There were mob ties, not only deep state ties, but mob ties to the assassinations of both men, in my opinion.

But, again, that report was going to come out on a particular date, and when I found that date, when that man mentioned the date that it was going to come out, I said, well, now we know why Nancy Pelosi caused the January 6th so-called insurrection in 2021. It had to be in my estimation because of the report about her father, and possibly her being investigated for mob ties, came out, or was first mentioned, on January 6th, 2021. You guessed it, that is why we had the famous Capitol riots Insurrection, or what I would call mainly a peaceful protest.

Nancy Pelosi’s own daughter admitted that her mother admitted to her that she was responsible for the actions. You know, Donald Trump tried to send both the National Guard and other support to stop any problems on that day, which Nancy Pelosi, who is in charge of the Capitol Protection, she’s in charge of the police force at the Capitol, refused any help from Donald Trump. So did the D.C. Mayor, another Democrat operative, I should just say. So, actually, it seems to me that the January 6th big story of the so-called insurrection was caused by and perpetrated by none other than Nancy Pelosi. She did this in an attempt to change the news for the next six months or more…and we’re still talking about it!

It took the focus off of the investigation of a very famous Democrat and a well-loved president, John Kennedy. He was actually investigating her father for mob ties.

I think you can see what I’m talking about now, how the deep state and the people in the deep state can change the news in an instant when they need to. 

They can always get a school shooting to occur, or a factory place shooting, if need be, or even a riot going on, you name it…they will get going whatever they want.

So then I was thinking, if this guy was just supposed to be able to be there, try to shoot Trump, and obviously was not going to be able to, contrary to what you’re watching on TV right now and all of the hoopla that you’re getting about right now, how close he was of killing Trump, that he would have been within 100 yards of Trump. Well, one of the things I want to explain, is something I gathered from listening to a former FBI agent who was also Secret Service in charge of presidents in the past. He said when they play on a golf course, like Trump’s golf course, they put four or five agents on the hole ahead of him, as well as the hole he’s playing. They also put one on the hole behind him. Let’s say they’re going to start with the first hole. They send the agents out there, and they inspect the first hole to make sure it’s clear. Then they go to hole two, the president comes out and plays hole one. Then when he’s done there, and he’s going to hole two, the Secret Service people who were on hole two, who had cleared that entire area, would move to hole three. The president would move to play hole two, and then another group would be on hole one. This action is all about making sure nobody can come up behind the president. This is how it’s done.

 So, when we go forward to what happened on Sunday, the forward patrol on the one hole ahead of Trump were the people who spotted the guy with the gun. 

Now, was there a breakdown in security? Yes. The breakdown was that the road itself should have had been monitored by policemen, or by the Secret Service, or even by the FBI. There should not have been an open road without cops sitting out there, or without Secret Service people sitting out there. They should be out there for at least six to ten hours before the golf game would start. Now, they tried to say the game was last minute and that they didn’t have foreknowledge of the game, which could be true. Then you still send the policemen or your Secret Service people out to that road the second that they know there is going to be a golf game, something they did not do. But my contention is this…I came to realize that there was no way, contrary to what you’re hearing, there was no way that this shooter was going to be able to shoot Donald Trump from where he was standing with a rifle through the fence. He would be spotted by that forward security detail, which he was, and they started shooting at him and he ran away. 

So, then I thought, you know, the deep state can hire professional assassins. I mean, you could get three Arab men that are terrorists that may be working for our deep state as well to do it. They could drive up there with a van, they could jump out at a moment’s notice when President Trump was on that hole, and they could have monitored that because there were no cops outside. So they could have successfully made it to the course, and they could have shot everybody standing there with a rapid-fire machine-gun. Then probably escape because if they were professional hit people, they get away with it all. That’s what could have happened. But that is not what happened here. It was that we had another lone idiot with a gun attempting this. Someone who was well-known to all of his neighbors and many others that came across him that know he wasn’t all there. In my opinion, he had no chance of shooting the president.

So what story was it possible? 

I’ve gone 15 minutes and if you’re still hanging on you’re going to be happy because I’m going to tell you something that I think is going to shock you.

There was a story that my brother-in-law, Joe Kovacs wrote from World Net Daily, that I want to discuss. Here it is…Bombshell ABC News affidavit released, exposes disturbing pro-Kamala debate scheme. Joe is actually my step-brother-in-law. His mother married my wife’s father long after they were friends and stuff like that. I’ve known Joe Kovacs almost his entire life since he was in, I think, the fifth grade. Joe works as the executive news editor for World Net Daily and he had a breaking story Sunday that I believe if it had gotten legs, I think the information he reported on could have altered this entire election; even could have put people in jail. It could have absolutely destroyed ABC News, Kamala Harris, and the Democrat operatives, and including, like I said, jail sentences.

So here’s the story. I’m just going to read it. A person who works for ABC, who’s been there for many years, who has inside knowledge, who is a whistleblower, has this quote, which starts off the article by Joe Kovacs on Sunday’s edition of World Net Daily. Quote, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris campaign insisted upon not only the fact of checking, a fact-checking Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were to be asked and which questions were not to be asked to Kamala Harris. Quote unquote. 

Now that is a shell-shocker and that was the story that was out before the so-called attempted assassination. We have it on our main page. You can find that link there and it’ll take you to the World Net Daily story by my brother-in-law Joe Kovacs. It reports that there are claims of a purposeful scheme to skew the September 10th ABC News presidential debate showing favor of vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris…over former president Donald Trump. These reports have been intensified with a Sunday release of a sworn statement by a network whistleblower specifying the allegations by affidavit under penalty of perjury. this was released by .NET YouTube which indicates that ABC coordinated with the Harris campaign to give her sample questions along with assurances Trump would be fact-checked live while Kamala would not be. Also, that favorable accommodations for the Democrats appearance were to be done on screen. The document dated September 9th one day prior to the debate is by a whistleblower whose identity is being withheld in Manhattan, New York. He’s a resident that’s worked for ABC News for more than 10 years in various technical positions.

Quote, for the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as candidate for the president of the United States, the whistleblower goes on to say. The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns about perceived biases within the news reporting within my employer’s debate that was to be hosted on September 10th, 2024. The ABC employee says that Harris received a particular accommodation included to and not limited to providing a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump and assurances regarding split screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris appearance relative that of Donald Trump. The sworn statement also continues saying, quote, it was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during debate while Kamala Harris would not be. This was widely known throughout the company, meaning ABC, that Donald Trump would be in fact fact-checked, and I would like to put in that I’m sure they discussed it would be fact-checked even if he told the truth they would say it wasn’t. In fact, various people were assigned to do fact-checked observations on Trump in the network. Quote, in fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign. The statement also indicates that Harris’ campaign was provided with sample questions that they would have asked her so she could rehearse those questions. Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed serious restrictions on what she could be asked by these moderators. This is what the whistleblower goes on to say. She could not be asked any questions including questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden. They couldn’t ask her about what she knows about Biden’s health and when did she become aware of health issues with him.

 Number two, she could not be asked anything regarding her tenure as attorney general in San Francisco. She could not be asked. They demanded they would never ask her what she did as attorney general in San Francisco because that information would alone destroy her candidacy among most voters. The third thing, no questions concerning her brother-in-law. Now listen to this. I don’t think this has been covered by anyone that I’m aware of and I’m a pretty good news junkie so I have read a lot of different magazine articles on the web, the Daily Mail and other outlets like that. I also watch Newsmax and Fox. I regularly watch other news programs as well. I’ve never heard this point that’s going to be made here. If you’ve heard it, you’re better connect than I am. But anyway, she could not be asked any questions about her brother-in-law named Tony West who faces, listen to this, allegations of embezzling billions, that’s with a B, B-I-L-L-I-O-N-S, billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and may be involved in her administration if she is elected. Did you hear that? The whistleblower also claims to have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressed fable of abuse towards him experienced significant concerns about potential retribution by ABC executives.

The employee also says that the purpose of this affidavit is to document and provide transparency regarding the issue of fairness and impartiality in the debate process and broader concerns about the journalistic integrity of ABC News. The conclusion of the sworn statement mentions copies of the sworn statement being sent via regular mail and FedEx to whistleblower’s home address and by certified letter to the U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson dated September 9, 2024. This all was to establish a record that the correspondent was sent before the debate commenced. So, this whistleblower said exactly what was going to happen in the debate one day before the debate and it turned out to be 100 percent accurate. Think about that. Additionally, under further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris campaign insisted upon not only fact-checking Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances to Kamala Harris or her campaign. And if they would not agree to this, they would decline to participate in the debate.

 One hour after this story hit WorldNetDaily, wait a moment… I want to go back a little bit. Today, a lot of people may be listening to this broadcast or reading The Plain Truth. They may see some stories from WorldNetDaily, but I don’t think people realize what an important journalistic website World Net Daily has always been. It’s kind of been erased from everyone’s minds in the last five years because the deep state went to war against Joseph Farah, the creator and owner of and the people of World Net Daily. But do you know Newsmax, the person Christopher Ruddy that started Newsmax, for example, started out working for World Net Daily? Do you know almost the who’s who of the conservative Republican right that are commentators all have been contributors and workers with WorldNetDaily over the years? That WND broke the story of Obama’s birth certificate, birth certificate, which was, by the way, planted by Hillary Clinton, not by Donald Trump but by Hillary Clinton’s campaign when she was running against Donald Trump. Yes, it is true, and they had a lot of evidence which has never been refuted, including Barack Obama’s own biography written by Barack Obama admitted such a thing. On the dust jacket of that book is where that tidbit of information was… now he claims it was a mistake that he didn’t see, it says, Kenyon-born senator, Barack Obama’s biography. This was before he was president when this biography came out.

The book is about a Kenyon-born senator from Illinois, Barack Obama’s story of how he overcame his hardships and made it to the Senate. 

That’s what the jacket of his book said. 

But going back to this story coming out Sunday and all of a sudden out of nowhere, we get this haphazard assassination attempt of Donald Trump, which now I am more than ever convinced it was never meant to be by the Deep State. It was a false flag to get the media off what would be the biggest story of the year. This story with ABC News, and I hope somehow it gets reignited somehow before this election and that this whistleblower is not done away with and this affidavit is not all of a sudden lost because I’m afraid this whistleblower’s life is in terrible jeopardy…I’m afraid he will disappear from history. So will these words that he wrote down in his affidavit if something does not come to light to protect this person.

This is the story of stories that the so-called attempted assassination of Donald Trump has removed from the headlines! If it was broadcast Sunday without the Donald Trump story, it would be the news on every network starting with, it would have started with Fox and WorldNet Daily, because they read Fox. I mean they read WorldNet Daily every day. All the insiders on both left and right, even though they may not want you to read it, they read it every day. So it would have started probably with Fox and Newsmax. It would have been taken by Rav TV. It would have been taken then by AON, and it would be forced to be covered by CNN and MSNBC. Finally, ABC would have to come clean and say something because knowing there is recordings of the conversations between their executives and the Harris campaign.

If that’s not a smoking gun that would have destroyed this entire narrative of this election and the deep state and the and media’s involvement in selecting our president by fiat, by coronation instead of by elections, nothing else would have done it.

It got wiped off the front page of every newspaper and all the TV programs on what I now see was a false flag attempt on Donald Trump’s life that was just done to change the news.

I hope and I pray that God does not allow this news to die about what ABC did in this debate. Everyone knows it. It was true, by the way. Everybody that’s going to read this knows it’s true on the left and right, but the actual sworn affidavit and the recordings nail it. Those recordings have to come to life, and I hope they do. Well, anyway, we’re about out of time. And I do just want to say one thing. ThePlainTruth.com is the place to go to find the news that you’re not going to be finding anywhere else in one place. Yes, WorldNetDaily has stuff, but we find the good stuff and we put it here, too. We want you to go to WorldNetDaily. We want you to go to these other sites, but you will have this microcosm of the entire thing you need to know from The Plain Truth, be it your health questions on your health today, what’s on the message board every day, very good subjects, what’s on these podcasts, and you go back and listen to all these different podcasts. It’s not only me, but also we put up podcasts of people we think it is very important for people to listen to their points of view. Also, the main page of The Plain Truth was this story that my brother-in-law Joe Kovacs wrote Sunday about the ABC News debate scandal, and it is a scandal. 

Well, that’s the show for today, and I do appreciate those people who are tuning in every day. It just seems like we do have a bigger audience.

We’re not very big. I’m telling you that right now. I’m not got no big head on me thinking that I’m doing a lot here, but more and more we get an increase in listeners. Remember, the Bible says 120 people showed up on the day of Pentecost. That’s all Jesus ever got to. I’m not even trying to get any further than Jesus.

Oh, and one last thing. I know I’m almost out of time. We’re going to have stories on The Plain Truth today throughout the day every day from now on. It’s not only going to be this one story…this one show, but we will also have one midday around noon time and in the evening as well…most likely at 7:11. Thank you for listening and please share this broadcast today with your friends and family. I appreciate you so much. This is Bob Barney saying, bye bye.