State toys with mandatory tests for homeschoolers

Lawmakers in New Hampshire are toying with the idea of demanding annual tests and portfolios
as well as vast new score-reporting requirements for every homeschooler
in a plan described as the "most anti-homeschool legislation ever
conceived" in the state. But the Home School Legal Defense Association is encouraging constituents to speak out against the plan pending in the state lawmaking body.

Staff attorney Mike Donnelly told WND the proposal was scheduled
for a vote today but didn't make the cut of subjects under
consideration. Now it is expected to be on the agenda at some point
next week, and parents need to speak out now, he said.

"This legislation is completely unnecessary.
The existing New Hampshire law works well, and in an era when
homeschoolers are significantly out-performing their public school
counterparts the last thing homeschoolers and taxpayers need is another
bureaucracy wasting their time and money," he said. "We hope that
enough legislators will see through the maneuver which is being used
and vote to retain the existing homeschool law."

Pending is a possible amendment to the state's requirements
that would make the state's homeschool demands "the most restrictive
and burdensome in the nation," HSLDA says.

"Members of the Democratic leadership are taking advantage of
the system and attempting to slip through the most anti-homeschool
legislation ever conceived in New Hampshire," he said.

The proposal would require that every homeschool student be
tested every year, undergo a portfolio review and submit test scores to
the state Department of Education. The agency would be granted
"sweeping rule-making authority" regarding homeschooling.

A bipartisan legislative study committee in the state recently recommended, on a 14-6 vote, that lawmakers not change the law.

An analysis by the HSLDA of the issue
said the package of recommendations from Rep. Judith Day is "the most
significant threat to New Hampshire homeschoolers" since 1990.

"These [plans] impose a needless burden on homeschoolers and
shift authority to determine whether a child should be homeschooled
from parents to others," the analysis said. "Parents have a fundamental
right under the United States Constitution to direct the upbringing and
education of their children, and legislation like Rep. Day's undermines
this right by going against the presumption that parents act in the
best interest of their children."

Both parts of the plan, H.B. 367 and 368, "are unnecessary,"
the analysis said, and would create additional burdens and costs and
are "problematic in that it creates potentially unconstitutional
vagueness which could result in needless litigation."

The HSLDA also offers on its website recommendations on how to oppose such proposals politely but firmly.

Related special offers:

"The Little Book of Big Reasons to Homeschool"

"The Harsh Truth About Public Schools"

"My child is an honor roll student … at home"

"You've Decided to Homeschool, Now What?"

U.N. protocol used to regulate homeschoolers

Parental rights already being lost

The man behind Parental Rights Amendment

Sen. Boxer tries to hurry children's 'rights' treaty

United Nations' threat: No more parental rights

Homeschooling goes boom in America