Global elites ‘are inspired and energized by Satan, the deceiver of the world’
The tactic of “divide and conquer” has long been used by great powers of the past, such as the Greek and Roman empires, to exploit divisions between peoples as a means to rule over them. A more recent example of this is the domination and subsequent rule of India from 1757 until its independence in 1947, first through the British East India Company (EIC) and later directly under the British Crown.
Britain manipulated the religious, social, and economic divisions and rivalries of the diverse peoples of India to gain economic dominance over them, then political and judicial control. Over time, many Indians came to perceive this and resent their foreign rulers. They saw the country’s valuable resources being exploited for the profit of Britain.
This resentment eventually developed into the Indian Rebellion of 1857, where several factions of Indian society fought to overthrow British rule in their country through the EIC. One of the leading figures of this rebellion was Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi (1828-1858), who became a national hero and symbol of resistance. However, one of the primary reasons the rebellion failed was because, though many Indians opposed the British, many fought for them, and the majority remained compliant with their rule.
Just over 51 years later, Indian lawyer and independence activist Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948) published a book called “Indian Home Rule” (1909). In it, he declared that British rule was established and maintained because of Indian cooperation. If Indians refused to cooperate, then British rule would collapse, and India would have its independence.
Gandhi succeeded where Rani Lakshmibai did not. He helped to achieve independence for his country not by raising armies to expel the British but by convincing large portions of Indian society to adopt his philosophy of non-cooperation and non-violent resistance.
In the United States, we can see many examples of local, state and federal government politicians and bureaucrats, both elected and unelected, pursuing policies that cause chaos, confusion and animosity between people in order to maintain control over them and enrich themselves.